ISSN 2285-5750, ISSN CD-ROM 2285-5769, ISSN-L 2285-5750, ISSN Online: 2393 – 2260
 

Published in Scientific Papers. Series D. Animal Science, Vol. LXV, Issue 1
Written by Vlăduț Dragoș BULMAGA, Ion RĂDUCUȚĂ, Costică CRISTIAN, Ion CĂLIN

Ewe reproductive rates are under 100 percent in most sheep breeding countries. The efficiency of the sheep industry together with the production of lambs needs to be improved. A great potential exists to increase sheep productivity and efficiency by increasing reproductive rate, largely through the exploitation of genetic variation among breeds. Profitability mainly depends on lamb production and various genetic and management methods exist to increase lamb output which depends on fecundity, prolificacy, lamb survival, and the number of lambings per lifetime. There are a few highly prolific sheep breeds available in the present and the challenge is to exploit this potential commercially. The aim of this paper is to review the Romanov prolific sheep breed and its use in different crossbreeding programs. The fastest way to improve prolificacy in local sheep breeds is by crossing them with rams from prolific breeds, like Romanov breed. Internally, within the I.C.D.C.O.C - Palas Constanta, the Prolific Line - Palas was created, following the crossing of Merinos de Palas sheep with rams from Romanov, Friesian, and Finnish Landrace breeds, which are characterized by an average prolificacy of 160-180%. The Romanov breed can be used in practice differently depending on the purpose pursued, namely use in purebred, use for the creation of new populations or lines with high prolificacy, use in simple industrial crosses to increase meat production (Romanov females x males meat), or use in double or triple industrial crosses (obtaining prolific hybrid females F1 in the year I - females of local breed x male of Romanov breed, which in the second year are crossed with males of specialized breeds of meat).

[Read full article] [Citation]

Published in Scientific Papers. Series D. Animal Science, Vol. LXV, Issue 1
Written by Adina Alexandra BAICU, Elisabeta Elena POPA, Mona Elena POPA

The lack of a consistent number of studies to indicate the benefits and safety of using food nanotechnology more accurately, as well as the novelty of the field, lead to reluctance from the consumer’s side. At the same time, researchers may feel discouraged by the intransigence of the consumer perception, coupled with a restrictive legislative framework. This results in a circular argument in which all actors in the food field are involved: consumer resistance to change leads to the demobilization of the scientific and academic community. This quantitative research was based on a questionnaire used to explore the acceptance of Romanian consumers (n = 359) of food products obtained or packaged using nanotechnology. In this sense, the extent to which consumers are informed about the use of nanotechnology in the agri-food sector has been determined. The research has been designed in such a way to identify the factors that influence consumers' perceptions in accepting nano-food or food packaged using nanotechnology. The aim was also to identify the demographic characteristics of consumers that would accept foodstuffs obtained or packaged using nanotechnology. The results of this research showed that consumers would more easily accept nanotechnology if it were applied to packaging rather than when it is directly applied to food. Familiarization with the term "nanotechnology" may lead to stronger opinions, either positive or negative. Food industry players could turn their attention to the presentation of concepts and benefits, as well as the risks associated with nanotechnology, to encourage consumers to form their own educated opinions. Such results may reveal an early openness from the consumers' side towards nanoengineering in general and a first step in overcoming food neophobia.

[Read full article] [Citation]

Page 10 of 10

The publisher is not responsible for the opinions published in the Volume. They represent the authors’ point of view.

© 2019 SCIENTIFIC PAPERS. SERIES D. ANIMAL SCIENCE. To be cited: SCIENTIFIC PAPERS. SERIES D. ANIMAL SCIENCE.

Powered by INTELIDEV